|
IT’S OFFICIAL. WE ARE SICK OF MASSIVE HIGHWAY PROJECTS!
SURVEY: CALIFORNIA VOTERS BALK AT MORE HIGHWAYS
Voters say: “Fix It First” before Caltrans funnels more tax dollars into mammoth road expansion projects. “If voters were in charge, (YOU MEAN THEY ARENT?) says Amanda Eaken of Sustainable Communities, “they understand what every study reveals: widening roads does not solve traffic congestion. Focusing on our communities to increase mobility & freedom from cars…that is the solution. The survey was released just days before SCAG was to vote on Long Range Transportation Plan. SCAG Region has 18 million. The voters lobbied SCAG officials and testified at public hearings to get Caltrans to scratch its highway project.
California is pictured as a sprawling wasteland of highway and subdivisions. But that’s not what we want, according to this recent survey released by Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates. What are we against? ü We are overwhelmingly AGAINST spending money on highways What do we want? ü We overwhelmingly FAVOR spending taxes on public transit. We do not want more highways. What else do we want? ü SHORT COMMUTES OUR GOALS:
“What makes a difference to elected officials, our decision makers, is the extent of community involvement in an issue, the community’s passion and determination –ongoing determination— not giving up, especially on controversial issues. Consistent well-planned group persistence makes all the difference. I cannot overemphasize the influence that an informed, active public has on local decision-making.” Naomi Schwartz, former County Supervisor “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Margaret Mead, Anthropologist (1901 – 1978) ———————————————————————————————————————————————–BULLETIN! The unintended consequence of a roundabout. Montecito’s $20 million “roundabout” is not big enough for large Fire Engines to use nor for all the giant Von’s trucks. Hermosillo Dr. is now a Truck Route.
Fiftieth Birthday of the CALTRANS HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) is fifty years old yet Caltrans still uses it exclusively. The manual favors movement of cars over any other option for moving people. It’s only use is for moving cars. Nothing else is factored. “It’s half a century old, yet is still the bible for Caltrans engineers. It was used exclusively for our freeway system.” said Hans Larsen, San Jose Dept. of Trans. “Caltrans only concern is moving cars at high speeds. They have no concerns for the local communities their projects affect. Santa Barbara Adobe Hut Tilly Chang, Dir., SF Co. Trans. Authority (devoted to congestion mitigation & innovative ways of moving people) is repeatedly rebuffed by Caltrans over implementation of Bus Rapid Transit. “The Caltrans Manual must change. We are in constant battle with them. They do no research on anything but moving cars. They are not a transit organization. They are a car moving organization,” says Chang. “We must constantly go through a rigorous process for getting any treatment not in their 50-year-old manual, approved. It’s expensive and ridiculous and wastes hours and hours of manpower. To Caltrans, safety means vehicles.” San Jose Trans. Authority fought Caltrans tooth and nail to narrow vehicular lanes and widen bike lanes at Tully Road. Casey Emoto, Director: “Caltrans design standards have not caught up. Because of this all local communities continue to be at odds with Caltrans. Dave Campbell, East Bay Bicycle Coalition: “Our concern is liability. If it’s not in their manual, the community becomes liable. Caltrans endorses only what is found in their outdated manual.” Caltrans confirms these liability issues won’t go away. “Innovative local leaders are thwarted by Caltrans because of this outdated manual they use,” says Corinne Winter, Director, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition. Communities want Caltrans to relinquish control of shared state roads and allow municipalities to have final say. It allows local engineers who live in the community to create a livable city. But, they foot the bill. Says Larsen, “The Caltrans manual is of the Horse and Buggy ————————————————————————————————————————————————— Caltrans doubled its engineers, and for no apparent reason, between 2000-2008: from 10,000 to 22,734. It is far, far more expensive to use the State’s DOT than private sector engineers. 1- They have experience on actual live job sites. The vast majority of Caltrans engineers do not. Caltrans engineers use one book They use only one book as their bible on designing freeways. They are not creative. They are not encouraged to be creative. With Caltrans on you resume, it is assured you will not get the job. 2- Private engineers save tax dollars. We avoid expense of overtime (white collar overtime being a Caltrans special,) $3,000,000 pension for 22,734 Caltrans employees, nor 30 years of paying their health insurance. Their pensions are (in billions) $6,831,000,000,000. In 2000, Caltrans employed 10,000 engineers. In 2008, Caltrans, 22,734 engineers |

